All 51 ranked rows
State codes, men’s and women’s ranks, balanced rank, cohort shares, estimated counts, and 1-in-N results.
Download CSV →Resources for reporters, creators, researchers, and anyone who wants to reuse a Pool Report number without stripping away its denominator or evidence tier.
research@datingpoolreport.comRe-rank every state for one filter set, with men and women shown side by side. Census-backed demographic filters are observed jointly; height, BMI, and optional current cigarette use are explicitly modeled.
State codes, men’s and women’s ranks, balanced rank, cohort shares, estimated counts, and 1-in-N results.
Download CSV →The same live ranking with applied filters and generated-at metadata. Cached publicly; no key or account required.
Open JSON →Variable definitions, source years, evidence tiers, modeling limits, and a plain-language interpretation guide.
Audit the method →The Pool Report. “The Pool Index: Best States for Dating by Your Standards.” 2026. https://datingpoolreport.com/best-states-for-dating. Estimates use 2024 ACS PUMS person-level weights and a labeled 2021–2023 NHANES physical-trait model.
For a specific filter set, cite the full result URL you used. Include “modeled estimate” in headlines or captions; do not call a calculated cohort a count of compatible partners.
Age, sex, personal income, education, and marital status with person-level survey weights.
U.S. Census Bureau source →Measured height and BMI distributions applied conditionally and labeled as modeled rather than jointly observed.
CDC/NCHS source →Age-specific current-cigarette prevalence applied as a national marginal model when the optional filter is selected.
CDC/NCHS source →Voluntary participant research with a 250-record publication gate and 50-record subgroup suppression rule.
Check fieldwork status →