HEAD TO HEAD / NO ACCOUNT

Whose standards leave the bigger pool?

One location. Two filter sets. Men and women stay visible the whole time.

LOCKED LOCATIONUnited StatesBoth sides use the same 2024 Census and labeled CDC model.
THEIR FILTERS
MEN1 IN 123
WOMEN1 IN 18K

2535 · 6′0″+ · $100K+ · Any education

YOUR FILTERS / HIDDENFinish your side to reveal the matchup.

No account, name, or saved profile required.

YOUR TURNMove the sliders.
Include only
Your answers stay in this browser until you reveal and copy the URL.

This compares modeled pool size, not compatibility or relationship odds. No names, accounts, or challenge answers are stored.

HOW TO READ IT

A standards comparison needs the same ruler.

01

Location stays locked

A shared challenge uses one national or state population for both filter sets. That prevents a New York result from being compared casually with a Texas result.

02

Both pools stay visible

Each person’s standards are applied to men and women on the same receipt. No gender switch hides the competitive comparison.

03

Observed and modeled stay labeled

Age, personal income, education, and current marital status are jointly counted in 2024 ACS PUMS. Height and optional BMI are separately modeled from CDC/NCHS measurements.

04

Rarity is not compatibility

The result cannot observe orientation, attraction, intent, values, app activity, personality, or whether anyone would choose each other. Read the full model card.

FAQ / STRAIGHT ANSWERS

Before the group chat argues.

01How do you compare dating standards fairly?+

Use the same geography, source year, population definition, and modeling rules for both people. This comparison locks the location and applies each person’s selected filters to both male and female pools.

02Does the friend comparison save our answers?+

No. The filter sets travel in the shared URL and are calculated in the browser. No account, name, email, or challenge-response record is created.

03Does a smaller pool mean someone is unrealistic?+

No. Pool size describes demographic rarity, not whether a preference is morally right, personally important, or likely to produce a relationship.

04Are these people active on dating apps?+

Not necessarily. The base population is weighted Census microdata, not a dating-app roster. Orientation, app activity, mutual attraction, intent, and compatibility are outside the model.